| |
|
|
Wednesday, May 23, 2007
Patti Page, "The Doggie in the Window" (March 21, 1953)
"...Elvis altered America to the fact that it had a groin with imperatives that had been stifled...Elvis kicked "How Much Is That Doggie in the Window" out the window and replaced it with 'Let's fuck.'" -- Lester Bangs
So this is the enemy, then?
Let's get right to the analysis. Perhaps it's silly to try to deduce why the song's narrator is going to California, maybe in the song's universe there is no why at all BUT I'd say if anything, it's probably business -- if an adult woman circa 1953 was to travel for any other reason, like to visit family or go on vacation, I think anybody she'd call "her sweetheart" would be expected to join her. So at the very least she's a fairly autonomous woman, possibly a career woman, maybe even "Patti Page" headed for an L.A. recording session. In contrast to the glamorous independence of Patti's doppelgänger, her significant other is dependent. He isn't manly enough to protect himself against "robbers" without a dog -- or her -- and he's going to be prevented from sowing his oats with another woman by having to take care of the damned thing. So much like a man forced to wear his wife's apron, the song is making a quaint joke about male domestication, describing a man under a woman's thumb even as she's physically absent.
Going through iTunes and allmusic.com, I don't see a single "straight" take on this song by a man, which doesn't surprise me at all. I can't see how the song would work if gender-reversed: it'd mean a guy leaving a woman alone with only a dog for protection against "robbers" -- or worse -- and that specter of violence against women would destroy whatever made the song even marginally amusing. (Judging by an iTunes excerpt, the Persuasions avoid this problem by having a child sing the verses, with the kid buying a dog for their mommy.) But it's pretty obvious a male singer couldn't hack the arrangement, either: its trilling woodwinds and dainty pace code the song as unmistakably feminine. Taken in this light, if we accept Simon Reynolds' and Joy Press' argument in The Sex Revolts that at the heart of certain kinds of rock rebelliousness lies a terror of being tamed by women, it suddenly becomes clear why "Doggie" has so long served as the synecdoche for the insipidity of pre-Elvis pop where more popular or (I'd argue) much worse records from the era no longer maintain much liminal presence in popular consciousness: this seriously sissy record offends rock self-image in ways that crap like "Oh Mein Pa-Pa" or Mitch Miller's "The Yellow Rose of Texas" never did. No, I don't think this song is very good; it's too simple, too insistent, and too slow to be even a satisfying novelty record. Had I been around in '53, its meager charms would've been destroyed from constant exposure -- eight weeks at number one! eighteen weeks in the top ten! But it's not really the enemy, either. 4
(link) |
|
|
|
|
|