| |
|
|
Friday, August 09, 2002
Merzbow, Material Action for 2 Microphones
The first track's title is "Hoochie Coochie Scratched," and that's a suitably off-center description of Akita's methods of production in this album: the use and abuse of vinyl, amplified cartridges, and radio broadcasts in the track's production...none of which makes Material Action much different from the other albums. OK, forgive my Salon-style rockcrit exposition and let's move on.
It starts with a blues record -- played backwards, so you know the devil's built right in! It soon gets completely overpowered by the feedback, by the drones, and a soupy rumbling sound that's familiar to me from other, more contemporary Merzbow records. (It sounds kinda like when you a tape a CD at too-high recording levels and the music breaks up.) But it returns. Masami lets the record speak its peace every once in a while, then it's replaced by a French chantoozie, and then someone whose genre and sex escapes me. Um...opera, maybe. It's that distorted. And then many others, including quite a lot of cute Japanese pop records played at high speeds. One grand moment: amped booms cut back and forth with tumescent and detumescent strings, creating a brand new rhtythm.) Another great moment later on in the album: Masami stutters the speeds of a pop record so the notes the singer sustains (and the music accompanied with it) get warped in a frenzy of nauseous woah-uh-woah-uh-woah-uh-woah-uh-woahs that sound almost as if they were meant that way. I mean, they've almost got a pop drama to them.
Does the music chosen have any particular purpose? These "found" sounds are the only obvious references to music-as-we-know-it here, should the weird eclecticism of his choices be significant to the listener? or are they eclectic to be disorienting and quasi-random? And is making fun of pop? You'd think so, but I can't read adverserial intent -- or much of any kind of intent -- in any of this. Perhaps I've been influenced by the fact that I haven't been able to positively identify a single piece of music, though there are times when I think I should.
Since these music snippets are the most obvious referents to the world, they're the easiest thing to talk about. But they're just a detail. I'm always focusing on a particular detail in the music rather than how it sounds a whole thing, so I'm not sure how useful these descriptions are gonna be to you, the potential consumer of MerzMusic. I'm neglected the electronics, the drifting organ, radio broadcasts, pots and pans, crunchy guitars and the overamped record scratching that EXPLODES in the sound field. I haven't commented about how sometimes the events in the right channel will be in the foreground of my attention with the stuff on the left serving as background, and how sometimes the reverse is true, and how violently both channels shift their roles. It's not that words fail me, it's just that I'm not really bothering to use them this way.
Not much I want to say about the last track, other than it's more obviously instrument-based than the other ones. This observation proves one thing about "New Acoustic Music No. 7": I've listened to it.
Let me utterly ruin that last kiss-off and a highlight of "New Acoustic" is that Masami Akita breathes on that track. It's not belabored, no huffing and puffing, no Donna Summer sexual miasma. He doesn't even breathe into the mike that much. But it seems out of character for him, because these are sounds that are unmediated by electronics or instruments or what have you. I've heard the fruits of his work, but I haven't heard HIM. And yeah, I know describing the voice as the direct expression of one's soul is a phallogocentrist cliché...oh...God, nevermind! You just don't typically notice his voice, is all.
Actually, it might have been Kiyoshi Mizutani breathing. Forget I said ANYTHING, then.
(link) |
|
|
|
|
|